Miami Beach commissioners voted 4–3 on September 10 to let the city pursue a GTA VI marketing agreement. The important word is pursue: the public record authorizes negotiations and a route to executing an acceptable agreement. It is not, on its own, proof that a final contract has been signed or that campaign materials are already installed.

This is a follow-up to that September 10 decision, not a claim that a fresh vote happened today. It also concerns Miami Beach, rather than the separate Miami-Dade proposal previously covered by GTA6State.

Quick answer: what did the city approve?

QuestionWhat the record supports
Which government acted?The City of Miami Beach.
When was the meeting?September 10, 2026.
What was the reported vote?4–3.
What action was authorized?Negotiation of a GTA VI promotional agreement.
Does that prove the contract is signed?No. A completed agreement would be a separate record.

What item C7AP says

The city's meeting record identifies Amplify Marketing Inc. as the proposed counterparty. The item concerns promotional materials on beachfront concession equipment and other public property, with a proposed campaign start of October 15.

The authorization also provides for the city manager and clerk to execute an agreement in a form acceptable to the city attorney. That procedural step matters: permission to negotiate terms is not the same thing as a published final contract containing those terms.

A pink and blue Shitzu Squalo boat passing the fictional Vice City waterfront in GTA VI.
Vice City provides fictional visual context for this real-world marketing story. The screenshot does not document any installation in Miami Beach. Credit: Rockstar Games.

Why the vote was contested

PC Gamer reports the 4–3 result and disagreement over whether an association with Grand Theft Auto helps or harms the city's image. Supporters treated it as an entertainment and promotion opportunity; opponents raised concerns about the franchise's violent associations.

GamesRadar's account describes proposed branding on beach chairs and umbrellas. Those descriptions explain the kind of campaign under discussion. They should not be rewritten as a list of advertisements that residents can already see.

Miami Beach is not Miami-Dade County

Three names are easy to collapse into one headline: the City of Miami, the City of Miami Beach and Miami-Dade County. They are different public authorities. A vote by one does not approve another authority's property, spending or agreement.

Our earlier Miami-Dade marketing proposal report covers that separate process. Neither story should be used to claim an airport has already been renamed or that every proposed part of a regional campaign is authorized.

What would establish the next step?

An executed contract, a subsequent city record or an official implementation announcement would clarify the final scope. Until then, the defensible conclusion is that Miami Beach approved moving negotiations forward after a divided vote. For the fictional setting behind the real-world interest, explore our Vice City guide.